The Heelers Diaries

the fantasy world of ireland's greatest living poet

My Photo
Name:
Location: Kilcullen (Phone 087 7790766), County Kildare, Ireland

Tuesday, January 13, 2015

truth never dies


in memory of Hugh Clowers Thompson an American who showed us the way

where's waldo

Idea for a children's puzzle book:
A large photograph of the world's Presidents and Prime Ministers marching arm in arm in Paris to commemorate the 17 French people murdered by Muslim Jihadis last Wednesday.
The caption will read: "Where's Waldo?"
(Maybe we could photoshop President Barack Obama arm in arm with Waldo into the photograph at the back. We don't want to distress the children by letting them know he didn't bother his arse to turn up. Apparently he couldn't attend for real because he was too busy all last week preparing a frivolous law suit against America's greatest General David Petraeus. I kid you not.)

why would they kill someone for drawing a picture of the prophet muhammed

"Why would they kill someone for drawing the prophet Muhammed?" wondered Bill.
I thought for a moment.
"Muslims have a whole host of red lines that they arbitrarily impose on each other and on anyone who comes in contact with them," I mused. "Remember that the word 'Islam' itself means 'submission.' The name of their religion is submission. Muslims choose to believe that they are told by the Prophet Muhammed in their Quran to impose submission on all other human beings. The arbitrary challenges for which Muslims kill are therefore simply an indirect way of demanding submission, even from people who are not Muslim. Instead of saying 'Surrender or I kill you,' a Muslim in the west prefers for the moment to say 'do not draw a picture of the Prophet Muhammed or I kill you.' These constantly growing and evolving cultural challenges are pretexts for demanding submission. They are also a way for Muslims to probe what the west will stand for. That is why Muslims pretend to believe that none of us have the right to draw pictures of whatever we want. At one level they are genuinely offended, I'll admit, but it's an offence (and offence taking) curiously likenable to a western lagar lout picking a fight with you in a pub by demanding: 'Are you staring at my pint!' This type of murderous aggression is a way for Muslims to dominate in any culture that permits them to enter. Muslims' own cultures have been dominated since their inception by what amounts to a Cult Of The Assassins. So in Arabia you get a veritable cornucopia of what are essentially excuses to kill, masquerading as principles. These are what I call the red lines of Muslim culture. Muslims more or less dare anyone to step over them on pain of death. The red lines are fairly extensive and impossible to predict unless you are familiar with Muslim culture. Even then some of the red lines, in tandem with being arbitrary, are also shall we say, quite recent, such as the imposition of head scarves for women, and indeed, the ban on images of the Prophet Muhammed. One commentator maintains that the imposition of head scarves began as recently as the 1970's. Never mind the rest of us, Muslims themselves live in terror of stepping over such red lines. For instance if a Muslim wishes to cease being Muslim, say to change his religion or to admit he's an atheist, he can be fairly sure of being murdered by other Muslims. I assure you there are many millions of Muslims including the Jihadis who do not believe Allah exists but would never dare say it for fear of being murdered immediately. The red lines, are a way of fostering fear and control, in a culture that has never known freedom. Girl Muslims who break arbitrarily imposed dress codes often end up being murdered by their own family members. Women who are rather arbitrarily deemed to have offended Muslim conceptions of family honour, say by being unfortunate enough to get raped, often end up being unfortunate enough to get murdered by their fathers, uncles and brothers when the woman tells of the rape. Societies where Islam prevails are ferociously violent and ferociously cowed societies. The red lines are everywhere. If anyone insults the prophet Muhammed, there's a similar willingness to commit murder. Drawing pictures of the prophet Muhammed is yet another comparatively recently imposed and thoroughly arbitrary red line. A few years ago the Southpark television cartoon featured the Prophet Muhammed and nobody noticed. They tried it again more recently when Muslims had started insisting such representations were blasphemy and all hell broke loose. As such, the Muslim prohibition on images of the Prophet Muhammed should now be seen as a deliberate challenge, and an arbitrary one, to our countries and our cultures. Effectively Muslim Jihadis are saying: "We just thought up this rule. And if you break it, we'll kill you." In that sense I would contend it's a confrontation Muslims have contrived purely for the purposes of promoting confrontation. I tell you it's about power as much as anything else. The news broadcaster CNN is today wrongly claiming that the Muslim prohibition on pictures of the Prophet Mohammed is a way of preventing worship of the Prophet Mohammed. This is a nice romantic CNN misreading of a fairly clearcut, fairly random, fairly recent, but now fairly murderously enforced Muslim prohibition on discourse. What CNN doesn't realise and hasn't bothered to find out, is that Muslims will more readily commit murder when they randomly deem someone to have insulted the Prophet Muhammed than they will if they randomly decide a person has insulted God. To all intents and purposes Muslims who murder human beings on this pretext, worship the Prophet Muhammed as a being greater than God. Now that's what I call blasphemy."

the CRUNCH question


Question: Why is there no Jihad in Ireland?

Answer: Because our newspapers don't report it.

before the slaughter

In the days before the Jihadi murders of 17 people in France last week, the Irish Times had been running one of its typical public awareness campaigns with blissful and groovy abandon, aimed at undermining further Ireland's already collapsing immigration law.
The campaign was two pronged.
First there were articles implying that when Jihadis are deported from Ireland, they often got killed in other jurisdictions, ergo says the Irish Times, none of them should be deported.
The second prong of the Irish Times campaign featured copious articles about a young Muslim man with an Irish passport, who went to Egypt last year and got himself arrested after taking part in riots.
The Irish Times insists that the young Muslim with an Irish passport should be released from jail and returned to Ireland.
Hoo baby.
The Irish Times in fact has been so succesful in this campaign that the young Muslim's legal bills are now actually being paid by me.
That is to say the Irish Ambassador to Egypt has been attending the trial at my expense courtesy of Ireland's corrupt kleptocratic Fine Gael government who I'm postulating are also using my money to pick up his legal bills.
You couldn't make it up.
The young Muslim's Daddy also has an Irish passport and is Imam at something called the Clonskeagh Mosque, which is reputed to be the largest mosque in Ireland.
I disagree with the Irish Times on matters like this.
As does virtually everybody else in the Republic of Ireland outside of the IRA, Al Qaeda and the Irish Times staff room.

memo to the cartoonists of ireland

Here is the news.
Muslim Jihadis didn't murder those people in Paris for drawing or owning pens.
Muslim Jihadis murdered those people in Paris because they drew pictures of a man with a beard and allowed the inference to be drawn that their pictures represented the Prophet Muhammed.
So there's no point in any of you drawing pens.
Pens are not what this is about.
You're not expressing solidarity with those who defied the Muslim Jihadis when you draw a pen.
You're not showing courage in the face of Muslim terrorism when you draw a pen.
You're not doing anything when you draw a pen except betraying the memory of those who were murdered this week by Muslim terrorists.
You draw the man with the beard and allow the inference to be drawn about his name or you do nothing.
And the bloke in the Irish Independent isn't even that good at drawing pens.

Monday, January 12, 2015

the CRUNCH question


Question: Is the Irish Times newspaper a heap of atheistic abortionist IRA infiltrated shite?

Answer: Yes.

dial m for jihad

Coming up for air.
A couple of days after Jihadis murdered 17 people in Paris...
How numbing are the tears of the crocodilion.
All this hand wringing by newspaper groups and politicians who have facilitated people traffickers like the IRA, the Cosa Nostra, Chinese Triads and the Russian Mafia in flooding our countries with Jihadis and drug dealing gangsters through the organised overwhelming and collapse of immigration law and the attendant silencing by media sneer of those of us who would have demanded its enforcement.
In my own country the Irish Times interrupted its Christmas news schedule, up to then almost solely devoted to labelling those of us concerned about Muslim terror as racist, and began an epic keen for the murdered French people.
The same day Irish State run television station RTE allowed Muslim terrorist Anjem Chowdry to go live on air threatening Ireland and her people with Muslim terror attacks.
Chowdry is an accomplished debater.
RTE put him up against one of their mellower presenters, a left wing wimminy feminist witterer called Miriam O'Callaghan.
He ate her alive.
The pavements of Paris still wet with the blood of innocents, and Ireland was listening to this Nazi Muslim warning us who we could have as friends, and threatening untold horrors to our nation if we did not bow to his demands.
Numb is the word.
And news coming through of another Islamist attack on a newspaper that published cartoons of the Prophet Muhammed, fire bombing this time, in Germany.
Numb and nummer.
Yet more attacks by the Al Qaeda Muslim terror army laying waste northern Nigeria.
Supposedly thousands killed the same day as the Al Qaeda Jihad murders in Paris.
And little girls used as suicide bombers in Nigerian markets a few days later.
They do keep busy, don't they.
Numb, numb, numb.
In fact for me, the only light relief of the past few days was when Irish Prime Minister Enda Kenny (a weak, vapid, vacuous, abortion legalising, Vatican embassy closing, hairstyle of a man) reportedly told French President Francois Hollande that he (Mr Kenny) was aware Ireland had become a hub for Jihadis and was keeping an eye on it.
Sigh.
That'll scare Al Qaeda alright.
You're arriving a little bit late at this party Enda.
Killing unborn babies is more your speed.
I suppose our best chance is if the Jihadis die laughing.
Or if they start using the unborn for suicide missions.

one good judge

At a bankruptcy hearing in the USA, an American Judge has correctly, honorably and courageously, deemed the evidence of Irish IRA fraudster David Drumm to be completely composed of lies.
Drumm fled to America using IRA ratlines to Boston (courteously operated by those lovable psychopaths from Whitey Bulger's murderous rackateering IRA Winter Hill gang) after Drumm and his IRA accomplices bankrupted Ireland in the year 2007 by creating illegal multi billion dollar loans for companies operated by IRA gangsters such as Sean Quinn and his various IRA progeny, loans which came via Anglo Irish Bank, a financial front company that Drumm and his IRA associate Sean Fitzpatrick were managing (on behalf of the IRA).
Yup.
Ireland was bankrupted to repay a bank for a bank heist disguised as illegal loans to the IRA, a bank heist that had been organised by the bank itself, a bank that was owned and operated by the IRA.
You couldn't make it up.
Drumm has transferred much of the money he stole to his moll (styled his wife for the purposes of money laundering) whose testimony in the American court was also a masterpiece of concatinated mendacity.
This week Drumm has been attempting to have the American court discharge him of his debts in order to finally put a lid on his nation busting bank job.
Ah bless.
Diddums wanted closure.
He just got unlucky.
He met an honest Judge.
I guess none of us saw that one coming.
In Ireland it couldn't happen.
What can we say about David Drumm, his wife Moneylaundericia, Sean Fitzpatrick, Sean Quinn, their IRA families, et al. (Particularly Al. I hate him.)
Scummmmmm is too kind a word.
I mean I don't want to go casting no aspoyshuns.
Since the original bank heist by Drumm, Sean Fitzpatrick, Sean Quinn and their odious IRA progeny and their accomplices, since then I say, corrupt Irish Judges have held a few pattycake trials and released these glorified IRA super thieves with community service orders or no sentence at all.
Moreover Sean Quinn is now using corrupt proxies to regain control of the original front companies which he had used as a cover to bankrupt the Irish nation back in 2007 through illegal billion dollar loans to his IRA front companies from the IRA run bank, a bank in which, it should be noted, Sean Quinn himself was a 25 percent shareholder.
Yes that's right.
IRA rackateer Sean Quinn owned 25 percent of the IRA bank that was systematically burglarising itself by illegally lending him billions of dollars.
Where did he get the additional billions of dollars to buy 25 percent of the bank that was already systematically burglarising itself by illegally lending him billions of dollars?
The bank lent him the additional billions of dollars to buy the 25 percent of the bank's shares after it had already lent him billions of dollars in order to systematically burglarise itself.
Hilarious no.
Anyway Sean Quinn is once more back in control of his nation bankrupting company styled the Quinn Group the one which acted as a receptacle for many of the billion dollar thieveries which David Drumm and Sean Fitzpatrick at Anglo Irish wanted to disguise as loans in what was officially the biggest bank job in human history.
At the height of the recession in 2008, no other bank on earth declared losses as great as Anglo Irish Bank.
So here we are.
The key corrupt proxy in putting Sean Quinn back in charge of the company he used to burglarise the Irish nation, was a local politician called John McCartin who belongs to a party styled Fine Gael, in fact the current party of government in Ireland.
We have no Judges, police or politicians in Ireland capable of handling this case or any other case relating to David Drumm, Sean Fitzpatrick, Sean Quinn or their odious IRA progeny and accomplices.
We are being governed by the IRA.
My only hope is that the Irish people have never in their history allowed scum to govern them.
That includes IRA scum.
Muslim terrorist scum.
And their accomplices in the Judiciary.
Thank you for your time.