belling the quinn
Token Catholic at Independent Newspapers David Quinn wrote a long article about sex abuse in the Irish Independent yesterday.
His article was the usual mealy mouthed posturing intended to preserve something of his own credibility while at the same time protecting Independent Newspapers from the charge that it is an anti Catholic organisation.
Yet barely a week ago in the same Irish Independent, a journalist called Ian O'Doherty's claimed that the Catholic church is a paedophile ring.
Independent Newspapers published Ian O'Doherty's lies in a prominent position amid the rest of their anti Catholic dross.
They published his lies under a headline reiterating those lies.
It is difficult to see how a man like David Quinn who makes such a show of claiming to be Catholic, can work for an organisation like Independent Newspapers after Independent Newspapers has published Ian O'Doherty's malign malicious mendacious and manipulative falsehoods.
I assume there's money involved.
I assume David Quinn has been well paid.
David Quinn commented last week:
"For practising Catholics there is only one appropriate response to the report of the Child Abuse Commission and it is one of deep unadulterated shame."
Personally I don't accept David Quinn's instructions as to how I should respond to anything.
I don't consider him a respected commentator on events.
I don't even consider him a Catholic.
I certainly don't look to him as an example of moral probity.
David Quinn is an employee of Tony O'Reilly's anti Catholic Independent Newspapers group.
It is inappropriate for him to tell anyone how to react to the publication of anthing, not even to a Child Abuse Report, and certainly not to Independent Newspapers, the Irish Times and RTE's attempts to recycle old allegations of sex abuse into a new scandal.
The real scandal is that these atheistic pseudo liberal entities (Heelers means Independent Newspapers. - Ed note.) for whom Quinn works are failing to report the true nature and extent of child abuse in Ireland, but are instead hijacking cases involving priests merly to pursue their own power agenda with regard to the destruction of the Catholic church.
My response to David Quinn's suggestion that I should feel shame about the publication of a liberal atheistic judicial report into the tiny minority of sex abuse cases that involve priests, is as follows:
"F--K OFF QUINN YOU GOBSHITE."
Interestingly enough David Quinn's more recent article yesterday lifted some of my own points about sex abuse from this blog.
He noted that the majority of cases did not involve priests and that the public had an incorrect perception of this.
Yes David.
But you failed to note that the public's false perception about priests being responsible for most sex abuse cases, arises solely from the crassly manipulative faux bleeding heart reportage of Independent Newspapers, the Irish Times and RTE.
A strange omission David.
A nocturnal omission.
Straight from hell.
David Quinn cites some statistics about sex abuse.
He claims that 96 percent of sex abuse cases do not involve priests or religious people.
Quinn's figure is taken from an American survey.
It relates only to the cases which actually reach the courts.
It does not include the vast majority of cases which occur in family households and never reach the courts.
In other words it vastly overstates the percentage of cases involving priests.
And even overstating the figures, it concludes that fully 960 sex abuse victims out of every thousand, are abused by family members, neighbours, cousins, rapists, predators, escaped lunatics, etc etc.
Not by priests.
Not by religious people.
Funny that those 960 victims out of every thousand sex abuse cases wouldn't get into the newspapers, isn't it?
We know Independent Newspapers thinks sex abuse victims are important.
They've devoted copious acres of newsprint to telling us so.
But perhaps some victims are more important than others.
Here is the news.
Independent Newspapers is deliberately focussing on the tiny minority of sex abuse cases involving priests, while effectively ignoring the huge preponderance of cases that do not involve priests.
Independent Newspapers, the Irish Times, RTE and other shadowy elites within our political and judicial culture, are doing this for a reason.
They want to destroy the Catholic church as a platform of influence for the general public, and they are using perpetually recycled allegations of sex abuse as a tool for their ends.
This is a kulturkampf the likes of which would embarass Otto Von Bismarck.
(The Kulturkampf or Struggle For Culture was a Prussian attempt to destroy the Catholic church in the 19th century.)
I do not accept David Quinn's statistics even though they hammer home my point.
(A point he has in typical mealy mouthed fashion lifted from this blog.)
Quinn's figures are from an American survey which has not been properly verified and whose compilers probably wished to overstate the figures for sex abuse committed by priests.
Readers will be aware that I have said 99.99 percent of cases do not involve priests.
My own figures were not arrived at lightly.
My conclusions were based on the following reasoning.
Sex abuse is occurring at exponentially increasing levels in households all over Ireland.
It has been at endemic and ever increasing levels since the 1980's.
Virtually all of these cases are occurring in family circles and do not reach court.
These cases are therefore excluded from any figures based on court appearances.
I think this fact must be clear to anyone who genuinely wishes to know the truth about sex abuse.
I think it must be clear to anyone who wants to know the truth about sex abuse so that the victims of abuse may be helped.
All the victims.
Not just the ones who can be hijacked by the Irish Independent, the Irish Times and RTE for their pogrom against the ancient church.
The vast preponderance of sex abuse cases are occurring in family households at the hands of non religious people.
This fact is not in dispute.
It is just ignored in the faux reportage from Independent Newspapers, the Irish Times and RTE.
I repeat.
Fully 99.99 percent of sex abuse cases do not involve priests, nuns or believing Christians.
Independent Newspapers, the Irish Times and RTE, have colluded to convey precisely the opposite impression.
Independent Newspapers, the Irish Times, and RTE have committed the very worst crimes of which they have accused the Bishops.
They have concealed sex abuse.
Simply by not covering it.
Simply by printing pages and pages about priests who commit abuse, and only scant articles about the 99.99 percent of non religious abusers hiding in plain sight.
As for David Quinn.
David Quinn should be ashamed of himself.
His article was the usual mealy mouthed posturing intended to preserve something of his own credibility while at the same time protecting Independent Newspapers from the charge that it is an anti Catholic organisation.
Yet barely a week ago in the same Irish Independent, a journalist called Ian O'Doherty's claimed that the Catholic church is a paedophile ring.
Independent Newspapers published Ian O'Doherty's lies in a prominent position amid the rest of their anti Catholic dross.
They published his lies under a headline reiterating those lies.
It is difficult to see how a man like David Quinn who makes such a show of claiming to be Catholic, can work for an organisation like Independent Newspapers after Independent Newspapers has published Ian O'Doherty's malign malicious mendacious and manipulative falsehoods.
I assume there's money involved.
I assume David Quinn has been well paid.
David Quinn commented last week:
"For practising Catholics there is only one appropriate response to the report of the Child Abuse Commission and it is one of deep unadulterated shame."
Personally I don't accept David Quinn's instructions as to how I should respond to anything.
I don't consider him a respected commentator on events.
I don't even consider him a Catholic.
I certainly don't look to him as an example of moral probity.
David Quinn is an employee of Tony O'Reilly's anti Catholic Independent Newspapers group.
It is inappropriate for him to tell anyone how to react to the publication of anthing, not even to a Child Abuse Report, and certainly not to Independent Newspapers, the Irish Times and RTE's attempts to recycle old allegations of sex abuse into a new scandal.
The real scandal is that these atheistic pseudo liberal entities (Heelers means Independent Newspapers. - Ed note.) for whom Quinn works are failing to report the true nature and extent of child abuse in Ireland, but are instead hijacking cases involving priests merly to pursue their own power agenda with regard to the destruction of the Catholic church.
My response to David Quinn's suggestion that I should feel shame about the publication of a liberal atheistic judicial report into the tiny minority of sex abuse cases that involve priests, is as follows:
"F--K OFF QUINN YOU GOBSHITE."
Interestingly enough David Quinn's more recent article yesterday lifted some of my own points about sex abuse from this blog.
He noted that the majority of cases did not involve priests and that the public had an incorrect perception of this.
Yes David.
But you failed to note that the public's false perception about priests being responsible for most sex abuse cases, arises solely from the crassly manipulative faux bleeding heart reportage of Independent Newspapers, the Irish Times and RTE.
A strange omission David.
A nocturnal omission.
Straight from hell.
David Quinn cites some statistics about sex abuse.
He claims that 96 percent of sex abuse cases do not involve priests or religious people.
Quinn's figure is taken from an American survey.
It relates only to the cases which actually reach the courts.
It does not include the vast majority of cases which occur in family households and never reach the courts.
In other words it vastly overstates the percentage of cases involving priests.
And even overstating the figures, it concludes that fully 960 sex abuse victims out of every thousand, are abused by family members, neighbours, cousins, rapists, predators, escaped lunatics, etc etc.
Not by priests.
Not by religious people.
Funny that those 960 victims out of every thousand sex abuse cases wouldn't get into the newspapers, isn't it?
We know Independent Newspapers thinks sex abuse victims are important.
They've devoted copious acres of newsprint to telling us so.
But perhaps some victims are more important than others.
Here is the news.
Independent Newspapers is deliberately focussing on the tiny minority of sex abuse cases involving priests, while effectively ignoring the huge preponderance of cases that do not involve priests.
Independent Newspapers, the Irish Times, RTE and other shadowy elites within our political and judicial culture, are doing this for a reason.
They want to destroy the Catholic church as a platform of influence for the general public, and they are using perpetually recycled allegations of sex abuse as a tool for their ends.
This is a kulturkampf the likes of which would embarass Otto Von Bismarck.
(The Kulturkampf or Struggle For Culture was a Prussian attempt to destroy the Catholic church in the 19th century.)
I do not accept David Quinn's statistics even though they hammer home my point.
(A point he has in typical mealy mouthed fashion lifted from this blog.)
Quinn's figures are from an American survey which has not been properly verified and whose compilers probably wished to overstate the figures for sex abuse committed by priests.
Readers will be aware that I have said 99.99 percent of cases do not involve priests.
My own figures were not arrived at lightly.
My conclusions were based on the following reasoning.
Sex abuse is occurring at exponentially increasing levels in households all over Ireland.
It has been at endemic and ever increasing levels since the 1980's.
Virtually all of these cases are occurring in family circles and do not reach court.
These cases are therefore excluded from any figures based on court appearances.
I think this fact must be clear to anyone who genuinely wishes to know the truth about sex abuse.
I think it must be clear to anyone who wants to know the truth about sex abuse so that the victims of abuse may be helped.
All the victims.
Not just the ones who can be hijacked by the Irish Independent, the Irish Times and RTE for their pogrom against the ancient church.
The vast preponderance of sex abuse cases are occurring in family households at the hands of non religious people.
This fact is not in dispute.
It is just ignored in the faux reportage from Independent Newspapers, the Irish Times and RTE.
I repeat.
Fully 99.99 percent of sex abuse cases do not involve priests, nuns or believing Christians.
Independent Newspapers, the Irish Times and RTE, have colluded to convey precisely the opposite impression.
Independent Newspapers, the Irish Times, and RTE have committed the very worst crimes of which they have accused the Bishops.
They have concealed sex abuse.
Simply by not covering it.
Simply by printing pages and pages about priests who commit abuse, and only scant articles about the 99.99 percent of non religious abusers hiding in plain sight.
As for David Quinn.
David Quinn should be ashamed of himself.
posted by heelers | 12:43 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home